Bitcoin Twitter Exposes the NY Times

In this issue we’ll be covering how the NY Times hit piece on Bitcoin backfired, and exposed how the NY Times is compromised.

Author

Daniel Solano
May 27, 2023

In this issue we’ll be covering how the NY Times hit piece on Bitcoin backfired, and exposed how the NY Times is compromised.

The New York Times article “examines” the environmental concerns associated with Bitcoin mining, particularly its high electricity consumption and subsequent pollution. It highlights various global locations where Bitcoin mining operations have “caused strain” on local power grids and “increased” greenhouse gas emissions. The piece also explores potential solutions, including the use of renewable energy sources and the development of more energy-efficient mining technologies, as a means to mitigate the environmental impact of the cryptocurrency.

The New York Times' Skewed Bitcoin Mining Expose Reveals Blatant Bias

It would, of course, focus on the only crypto topic the Times is truly interested in: the massive, apparently catastrophic energy cost of bitcoin mining. On its face, the piece is almost comically incoherent, but that very incoherence highlights its real message: Bitcoin is bad because we say it is. While the headline grandly declares it will expose “The Real-World Costs of the Digital Race for Bitcoin,” the bulk of the article’s factual findings seem to describe failures in a specific load-balancing incentive program in Texas.

finance.yahoo.com/news/york-times-skewed-bitcoin-mining-171743706.html

This article discusses a critique of The New York Times' portrayal of Bitcoin mining in Kazakhstan, which has been accused of being skewed and overly negative. Critics argue that the NYT article focuses on environmental concerns and geopolitical tensions without adequately addressing the benefits of Bitcoin mining in the region, such as increased investments, job creation, and technological advancements. The piece highlights the importance of balanced reporting on the rapidly evolving Bitcoin industry to avoid perpetuating misconceptions and biases.

Who Benefits from the NY Times’ Attack on Bitcoin?

A recent editorial attack on Bitcoin mining by The New York Times raises questions about its journalistic integrity and editorial process.

bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/why-the-new-york-times-attacks-bitcoin

The article criticizes The New York Times for its negative portrayal of Bitcoin, suggesting that the publication's attacks on the cryptocurrency stem from its close ties with legacy financial systems and the U.S. government. It lays out that the NYT's critiques of Bitcoin's energy consumption and social implications are often one-sided and lack context. The author emphasizes the importance of recognizing the transformative potential of Bitcoin and the need for more balanced reporting on the subject.

Very little about the hit piece makes any sense. Is it a coincidence that The New York Times attacked Texas Bitcoin mining at just the right time that it could benefit one of its largest shareholders?

What they don’t tell you about Bitcoin